Skip to main content

Should Teachers Be Warm and Fuzzy?

I received my Spring 2010 evaluations yesterday. They were the best I've ever had, which was great. But in the midst of the positive comments, multiple students complained that I was cold and unapproachable, and uninterested in hearing their problems.

This all true. I'm not a warm and fuzzy teacher, and I'm not flexible about the standards for the class. Despite what they think, I do wish the best for my students. But I am very aware of my role is in their lives: I'm their sociology professor. I'm not their father, their counselor, their friend, or their confidant. I think I'm really good at teaching them sociology and I know I'd be pretty cruddy at doing those other things.

My instinct is to ignore the comments and focus on the positive, as well as the critical feedback that strikes me as more constructive. But I'm curious why students feel compelled to critique me for my warmth, and lack thereof.

Comments

  1. Interesting criticism, and I'm not sure I'd throw it out, but I suspect there's a difference between personal "warmth" and an ability to listen in such a way that people feel heard, regardless of whether or not you solve their problems for them. I've interacted with people who weren't particularly cuddly but did strike me as interested in what I had to say and respectful of me as a person. I've also known "warm" people who didn't seem particularly sincere. There's something else here. Your job, as I see it, is to suss out whether the students are asking you to be a cookie-baking sweetheart, or if what they're really telling you is that they don't feel particularly heard and respected. Tossing out critique that doesn't fit your current understanding of your approach to teaching would, essentially, invalidate the thoughts and feelings of the students who offered it.

    Have you read any of Marshall Rosenberg's work on Nonviolent Communication? It's probably worth perusing if you haven't. While I find his tone a little annoying at times, the observations/feelings/needs/request model is effective even when you are ultimately not going to bend your standards.

    For what it's worth, parenting and teaching can overlap significantly. Perhaps investigating your assumptions about the differences between the two could help to get to the source of the students' critique?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Returning to add that I understand that you have purposefully chosen not to entangle yourself in the emotional lives of your students. This strikes me as a very appropriate and professional choice. It is possible to acknowledge the feelings of students and thereby provide validation to them without emotional involvement. That is, acknowledging that feelings exist is not the same as engaging in an emotionally charged relationship with the student.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

10 Pro-Tips to Guide you Through the Semester

1. Use the 3-column backwards-design system for creating your course. Identify your forward-looking measurable course objectives . "By the end of the semester, students should be able to...." " Forward-looking " means focusing on how students will use this learning after the semester ends. That may mean in their future careers, in their lives as citizens, or simply in the next course of a sequence. But it should not be internal to the class. "Successfully write a term paper" is not a forward-looking goal. A forward-looking revision would be "communicate arguments with evidence to different types of audience." Identify the assignments and other mechanisms that help you to assess whether and how the course objectives have been achieved for each student. Too often, course goals name outcomes that simply cannot be measured. Similarly, a lot of assignments exist for generating a grade without any alignment to the objectives. Alignment means tha

The Common Good: A Syllabus

This summer, I taught my first section of Intellectual Heritage, the program I have directed since 2017. IH offers 2 courses, required of all students at Temple: The Good Life and The Common Good. I taught The Common Good in Summer 1, a 6-week intensive session that was taught online due to COVID-19. Image of the Code of Hammurabi I taught the course asynchronously, which is standard practice in IH. Asynchronous courses, when correctly designed, provide the best opportunity for student engagement and retention. Recognizing that many students are living at home where they may either be competing with family members for internet access, or they may not have it at all, the asynchronous format allows them to complete assignments and discussions at times and places that suit them. I had students who did their work from their dining rooms, and students who did their work while at their jobs (usually because that was their best internet access point). The Pillow Book by Sei Shônag

Internship Skills: Difficult Scenarios and Difficult People

Internship Skills: Difficult Scenarios and Difficult People For this exercise, we will take a look at difficult situations that can arise at work. --> Learning Objectives 1.      Pinpointing Your Triggers 2.      Recognize How Culture and Personality Influence Your Reactions 3.      Implement Healthy Conflict Resolution Strategies 4.      De-escalate Volatile Situations Pinpoint Your Triggers Discussion: What do you think your personal triggers are? What kinds of interactions have pushed your buttons in the past? Culture     Discussion: Where have you encountered cultural differences and conflicts in the past? What did you learn from them? Gender   Discussion: Where have you confronted gender differences in the past? How have you confronted them? Personality Discussion: Which personality type/s are you? How do you interact with the various personality types? Strategies De-esc