Skip to main content

Final Evaluations: Graduate Classical Theory

I had 10 students in this course. We read several selections from a range of theorists. The usual three were included: Marx, Weber, Durkheim. I also included Comte, Spencer, Tocqueville, Du Bois, Beatrice Potter Webb, Marianne Weber, Mead, and Blumer. Students took turns facilitating class discussion. Students chose a contemporary topic and wrote a paper applying the work of at least 3 classical theorists to that topic. They wrote the paper in the following stages:

1) Secondary lit review
2) Primary lit review (the actual theorists)
3) Argument
4) First Draft
5) Final Draft

Students also had a funny little final exam that I gave them. It was actually distributed on day 1. It was a list of 40 names and terms that they should know as part of their sociological cultural capital. They had to write an explanation for each, citing their source, and not using the same source for more than 5 items.

To process the evaluations, I made 3 columns on a sheet of paper, labeled: Pros, Cons, Suggestions. I made a list of each thing that was stated, noting also the frequency with which it was stated. I choose to ignore pros and cons that were mentioned only once, but I will happily consider any suggestion, regardless of frequency.

Pros:
Facilitation Assignment (5X)
Paper Stages (4X)
Organized Syllabus (4X)
Du Bois selections (3X)
Du Bois Video (3X) -- WEB Du Bois: A Biography in Four Voices
Class Discussion (3X)
Ritzer text (2X)
Organized Blackboard site (2X)
Final Exam (2X)
High Expectations (2X)
Due Dates (2X)
Flexibility of the Professor (2X)
Selection of Theorists (2X)

Cons:
Ritzer text (2X)
Final Exam (2X)
Du Bois Video (2X)

(So the cons effectively knock out 3 of the pros, but in doing so I'm left with no cons.)

Suggestions:
More lecturing by professor (4X)
More time on classical feminist theory (2X)
More time between assignments (2X)
Shorter selections (1X -- eye roll)
Shorter final exam (1X)
More on religion (1X) -- really just a personal preference by 1 student
More symbolic interactionism (1X)
More guidance with facilitation
Submit argument section earlier

Quantitatively, there were 11 questions scaled 1-5. My scores ranged from 4.2 to 4.9. My lowest scores were for "I [the student] came well prepared for class" (4.2), "classroom atmosphere" (4.4), and "taught this course well" (4.5). My top scores were for "explained the educational objectives" (4.9), and "well organized instructor" (4.8).

So, overall, the class went very well. I probably should add in a definite 30 minute lecture from the professor for every class next year, rather than just jumping in less deliberately. I would love to add a second week of feminist theory but am not sure what to sacrifice in order to accomplish that. Perhaps Parsons.

(lightning didn't strike)

I also would like to rearrange the paper stages as follows:

1) Theorist 1: Primary and Secondary
2) Theorist 2: Primary and Secondary
3) Theorist 3: Primary and Secondary
4) Discussion/Argument
5) Final Draft with Introduction, Conclusion and References

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teaching Tools

I've added two new teaching tools to my regime this semester. 1. Skitch . Skitch is both a desktop application that lets you capture images easily, and a website that allows for easy image sharing . I'll use it this semester to capture images that we can discuss in class, and to take pictures of the blackboard at the end of class (to capture interesting brainstorming sessions). I can upload the pic via email, straight from my phone, and the students will have access right away. I can use the image capture software to circle parts of the reading, charts, graphs, etc. and bring those to the surface for discussion. 2. Slideshare . This program allows you to upload PowerPoint presentations to the Web. I uploaded all of my slides for the semester to one page where they can be accessed from any computer. It allows me to worry less about carrying the slides on a USB drive or having to upload them to the course Blackboard page, which sometimes doesn't open. It also makes fo...
4 comments
Read more

Internship Skills: Difficult Scenarios and Difficult People

Internship Skills: Difficult Scenarios and Difficult People For this exercise, we will take a look at difficult situations that can arise at work. --> Learning Objectives 1.      Pinpointing Your Triggers 2.      Recognize How Culture and Personality Influence Your Reactions 3.      Implement Healthy Conflict Resolution Strategies 4.      De-escalate Volatile Situations Pinpoint Your Triggers Discussion: What do you think your personal triggers are? What kinds of interactions have pushed your buttons in the past? Culture     Discussion: Where have you encountered cultural differences and conflicts in the past? What did you learn from them? Gender   Discussion: Where have you confronted gender differences in the past? How have you confronted them? Personality Discussion: Which personality type/s a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Temple Email Basics

This post really just applies to folks at Temple University. As a Temple student, your initial email address may be set up as a random series of letters and numbers, such as TUR93847@temple.edu. That makes it hard for recipients to know who they are receiving emails from. Here are three easy steps to make your emails easy to identify! 1. In your email, click on the settings option. Then choose the option "Accounts." Then, under "Send Email as," click on "edit info." If your account is linked to multiple addresses, be sure to choose the correct address. Finally, enter your name and click on "save changes." 2. Still in the settings, click on "General." Scroll down to "Signature." Fill in a signature that includes your first and last name. You can also add other contact information such as an email address, business phone, or social media handles. Click on the box at the bottom that reads "Insert ...
Post a Comment
Read more